Purdue News

July 12, 2006

Purdue survey: Farmers sold on grain marketing alternatives

WEST LAFAYETTE, Ind. — Farmers are savvier about selling grain today than they were a decade ago, according to a Purdue University survey.

The survey of about 50 large-scale producers attending Purdue's 2005 Top Farmer Crop Workshop found that farmers not only are utilizing a wider variety of grain marketing practices than a similar survey group in 1994 but also are using those sales techniques for more of their production.

Purdue agricultural economists George Patrick and Corinne Alexander conducted the 2005 survey. The pair will present their findings during the 2006 Top Farmer Crop Workshop, which takes place July 16-19 on Purdue's West Lafayette, Ind., campus.

Farmers asked about their marketing preferences in 2005 used a variety of price enhancement and price protection techniques, Patrick said. Price enhancement involves selling grain when market prices are on the high side. Conversely, price protection techniques are attempts to shield a farmer from possible low prices.

"Farmers in general are more concerned about their marketing as time goes on, and they've learned more about these different marketing techniques, so that they feel more comfortable using them," Patrick said.

"What we have found in our survey is that farmers are tending to make quite a bit more use of some of the techniques that are available, regardless of whether they consider them price enhancement or price protection. Farmers can go with cash or spot markets, cash forward contracts, futures hedges, take a position with options, do deferred pricing or look at basis contracts."

More than 95 percent of farmers surveyed in 1994 sold grain on the spot market or through cash forward contracts, by which they enter into an agreement with a buyer on the future delivery and price of their grain.

Those two marketing techniques were still popular in 2005, Patrick said. Less popular in 1994 but gaining acceptance and use by 2005 were other futures-related sales methods. The percentage of farmers in both surveys who said they used alternative marketing techniques for price enhancement and/or price protection purposes included:

• Futures (price enhancement) – 61.4 percent in '94; 86.4 percent in '05.

• Futures hedge (price protection) – 64.6 percent in '94; 86 percent in '05.

• Options (price enhancement) – 73.5 percent in '94; 84.1 percent in '05.

• Options (price protection) – 69.4 percent in '94; 88.4 percent in '05.

• Deferred pricing (price enhancement) – 73.5 percent in '94; 77.3 percent in '05.

• Deferred pricing (price protection) – 73.5 percent in '94; 78.6 percent in '05.

• Basis contract (price enhancement) – 73.5 percent in '94; 93.2 percent in '05.

• Basis contract (price protection) – 70.8 percent in '94; 92.9 percent in '05.

Farmers in the 2005 survey not only said they are employing more marketing techniques, but also their understanding of those methods has increased. "Another part of the questionnaire asked farmers whether they wanted additional information about some of the marketing techniques, and there was only a small percentage who felt they needed that additional information," Patrick said.

One reason the 2005 survey group might not have wanted more information could be tied to their use of marketing advisory services and consultants. The survey indicated that 60 percent of those surveyed used market adviser services or marketing consultants, compared to only 27 percent in the 1994 survey.

"Another area that we looked at in our survey was the objectives that farmers have in their marketing programs," Patrick said. "One of the changes we noticed was that in the 1990s, farmers gave quite a bit of weight to managing their income for tax purposes as a factor in their marketing programs. In 2005 when we interviewed them, the importance of that had dropped significantly.

"Even though I work a lot in the agricultural tax area, I find that to be encouraging because farmers do need to separate their marketing decisions from the tax considerations."

Patrick's and Alexander's Top Farmer Crop Workshop presentation, "Your Opinions about Price Enhancement and Price Protection," is scheduled for 11:05 a.m. Tuesday (July 18).

The 39th annual workshop takes place in Purdue's Pfendler Hall. More than 50 speakers from Purdue's College of Agriculture, sister land-grant universities and the agriculture industry will cover a broad spectrum of crop-management topics. The workshop is geared toward leading crop producers who use cutting-edge technology and production practices. Most who attend farm 2,000 acres or more.

Workshop registration is $250 per person and $75 for each additional person from the same farm. Registration fees include two meals, coffee breaks, a workshop proceedings notebook for each farm and the use of Purdue computers. Lodging and other meals are extra.

Enrollment is limited.

For a complete list of Top Farmer sessions, registration forms and lodging options, log onto the workshop Web site or contact Jess Lowenberg-DeBoer, workshop coordinator, at (765) 494-4230 or by e-mail at lowenbej@purdue.edu.

Writer: Steve Leer, (765) 494-8415, sleer@purdue.edu

Sources: George Patrick, (765) 494-4241, gpatrick@purdue.edu

Corinne Alexander, (765) 494-4249, cealexan@purdue.edu

Ag Communications: (765) 494-2722;
Beth Forbes, forbes@purdue.edu
Agriculture News Page

 

Note to Journalists: Other farm-related story ideas are available at Purdue Agriculture's Farming 2006 Web site

 

Related Web site:
Purdue University Department of Agricultural Economics

 

To the News Service home page

Newsroom Search Newsroom home Newsroom Archive