September 2, 2009
New computer models aim to classify, help reduce injury accidentsWEST LAFAYETTE, Ind. - Researchers are developing computer models to comb through thousands of injury reports in large administrative medical datasets or insurance claims data to automatically classify them based on specific words or phrases.
"One goal is to identify the most important causes of injuries so that efforts could be directed toward reducing the burden of injuries in society," said Mark Lehto, an associate professor in Purdue University's School of Industrial Engineering.
The reports, usually filled out by employers, health-care professionals or claimants themselves, are currently classified by manual coders hired by users such as the National Center for Health Statistics, hospital staff or insurance industry handlers who review thousands of "injury narratives" included in reports.
"This is obviously very labor-intensive," Lehto said.
The Purdue engineer and researchers at the Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety in Hopkinton, Mass., assigned codes to injury reports from workers' compensation claims using two different models developed with a technique called "Bayesian methods."
"The predictions were quite good," Lehto said. "The results were comparable to the human coders. The accuracy is surprising considering all of the misspellings, run-on words, abbreviations and inconsistent or missing punctuations seen in these workers' compensation claim narratives."
An example of an injury-claim narrative included in the paper is: "HUSB. & SON WERE REARENDED AT RED TRAFFIC LIGHT BY DRUNKEN DRIVER DRIV-ING AT LEAST 45 MPH INFULL SIZE PICK-UP TRUCK//N."
"Can you imagine reading through 10,000 of these narratives and trying to interpret what the cause of injury is and assign different codes?" said Lehto, the 2008 Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety visiting scholar.
Research findings were detailed in a paper published in August in the journal Injury Prevention. The paper was written by Lehto and Liberty Mutual research scientists Helen Marucci-Wellman and Helen Corns.
Insurance companies enter, maintain and manage tens of thousands of claims annually. The study examined approaches for efficient assignment of each claim using a computer approach with one and two-digit "event code" categories developed by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
"So now we are trying to take these vast sets of data, which have been limited in their utility due to the large expense in hiring manual coders, and we are able to glean important information from the injury narratives and come up with new knowledge on the potential causes and prevention of injuries," Lehto said.
The new models might lead to programs that automatically code reports as they are being filed.
"These models can be easily updated to deal with new types of accidents they haven't encountered before," Lehto said.
The models calculated the probability that reports would be classified by human coders in specific categories. One model, called "naive," reviewed individual words, and the other, called "fuzzy," looked at sequences of words and phrases in the narratives, such as "fell off a ladder."
The researchers used a database of 14,000 claim cases, with 11,000 used to develop the models and 3,000 used to test the models.
"It's important to distinguish that we predicted 3,000 cases that were different than the ones used to develop the models," Lehto said. "These were cases the models hadn't seen before, and the models accurately predicted how these cases would be classified by human coders."
Writer: Emil Venere, 765-494-4709, email@example.com
Sources: Mark Lehto, 765-494-5428, firstname.lastname@example.org
Joanne Bangs, communications specialist, Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety, 508-362-5031
Purdue News Service: (765) 494-2096; email@example.com
Note to Journalists: An electronic copy of the paper is available from Emil Venere, Purdue News Service, at 765-494-4709, firstname.lastname@example.org
Bayesian Methods: A Useful Tool for Classifying Injury Narratives
M Lehto,1 H Marucci-Wellman,2 H Corns2
1 School of Industrial, Engineering,
2 Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety
To compare two Bayesian methods (Fuzzy and Naive) for classifying injury narratives in large administrative databases into event cause groups, a dataset of 14,000 narratives was randomly extracted from claims filed with a workers' compensation insurance provider. Two expert coders assigned one-digit and two-digit Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Occupational Injury and Illness Classification event codes to each narrative. The narratives were separated into a training set of 11,000 cases and a prediction set of 3,000 cases. The training set was used to develop two Bayesian classifiers that assigned BLS codes to narratives. Each model was then evaluated for the prediction set. Both models performed well and tended to predict one-digit BLS codes more accurately than two-digit codes. The overall sensitivity of the Fuzzy method was, respectively, 78% and 64% for one-digit and two-digit codes, specificity was 93% and 95%, and positive predictive value (PPV) was 78% and 65%. The Naive method showed similar accuracy: a sensitivity of 80% and 70%, specificity of 96% and 97%, and PPV of 80% and 70%. For large administrative databases, Bayesian methods show significant promise as a means of classifying injury narratives into cause groups. Overall, Naive Bayes provided slightly more accurate predictions than Fuzzy Bayes.
To the News Service home page